The US employment data removed what was perceived as the last potential hurdle to Fed decision to hike rates later this month
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of England meet in the week ahead
We dispute claims that the dollar’s rally is over because the divergence of monetary policy has all been discounted
Great uncertainty remains over the outlook for China’s policy
The outlook for EM monetary policy is also diverging
Price action: The dollar is broadly firmer against the majors. Sterling and the yen are outperforming, while the Norwegian krone and the Kiwi are underperforming. The krone was hurt by weak Norway IP data. The euro continues to give up its post-ECB gains, now trading just above $1.08 after disappointing German IP data, while sterling is holding just below $1.51. Dollar/yen is trading near 123.40. EM currencies are mostly softer. MYR and THB are the exceptions, up slightly and outperforming, while RUB and KRW are underperforming. MSCI Asia Pacific was flat on the day, with the Nikkei up 1%. MSCI EM is down 0.3%, with the Shanghai Composite up 0.3% and the Shenzen Composite up 1.3%. Euro Stoxx 600 is up 1.5% near midday, while US futures are pointing to a higher open. The 10-year UST yield is flat near 2.27%, while European bond markets are mostly firmer. Commodity prices are mostly lower, with oil down around 1% after the OPEC meeting on Friday saw quotas scrapped.
Last week lived up to the hype. It was indeed a momentous week. China joined the SDR, with a weight that puts it in third place behind the dollar and euro. The ECB did ease policy. It delivered a 10 bp cut in the deposit rate (now -30 bp), extended its asset purchase program for six months (to March 2017), broadened the range of assets that can be bought to include regional bonds, and declared intentions to reinvest maturing proceeds.
The US employment data removed what was perceived as the last potential hurdle to Fed decision to hike rates later this month. Not only was the headline number a little stronger than expected at 211k, but October jobs growth was revised to almost 300k. The internals were also generally favorable though the underemployment (U-6) did tick up, but is still at its lowest level since 2008, except for October. The breadth of job gains (industries) was the best in nine months. The number of people quitting their jobs stands at a four-month high, and this coupled with labor shortages reported in the Beige Book, suggest reasonably good prospects for increased wage pressure.
A great degree of uncertainty has been removed from the markets. The BOJ balance sheet is expanding at an incredible clip of JPY80 trillion a year, and Governor Kuroda sees no compelling reasons to up the ante further. In fact, due to more recent data, especially capital expenditures, Japan’s GDP, which contracted in Q3, is likely to be revised to show a little growth. The ECB reviewed its monetary policy and targets. It made its adjustments, and, barring a significant shock, is unlikely to review it again until toward mid-2016. The Bank of Canada and the Reserve Bank of Australia have recently reaffirmed their steady course.
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of England meet in the week ahead. A Bloomberg survey found 15 of 18 economists expect the RBNZ to cut the cash rate by 25 bp, bringing it to 2.50%. The vast majority expect this to be the last cut in the cycle. We suspect there is a greater chance than suggested by the survey that the central bank stands pat. Ideas that the RBA’s neutral stance, the small move by the ECB, and increased confidence of a Fed hike may steady the RBNZ’s hand helped spur almost a 1% rise in the New Zealand dollar before the weekend.
Draghi, Constancio, and others at the ECB blame market participants for the second largest single daily rally in the euro (the first being when the US announced QE in March 2009) and the sharp backing up in interest rates. However, the Swiss National Bank was probably as surprised anyone. The sense of urgency that Draghi had seemed to have expressed and some trial balloons apparently launched likely spurred SNB officials to prepare for the worst. What was actually delivered, and the market’s response, takes pressure off the SNB from having to go further down the rabbit hole of unorthodox policy.
A case can be made for easing Swiss monetary policy. The Swiss economy stagnated in Q3, as deflationary pressures continue (CPI -1.2% year-over-year in October) and retail sales contracted in nine of the first ten months of the year (year-over-year basis). However, the sight deposit target rate is already minus 75 bp. Nor is the currency exerting much pressure. The franc was trading at five-year lows against the dollar before last week’s correction. Against the euro, the franc within a lower range that has been established since late-August (for the euro, it is CHF1.0750-1.1000).
The Bank of England is the least likely to surprise. Policy is on hold though there may still be one (and only one) MPC member that is resisting, favoring a hike. There have been four macro-developments for the MPC to consider. There has been a further drop in the price of oil. There is more confidence that the Fed will hike rates this month. The ECB eased. Sterling had appreciated 4% on a broad trade-weighted measure from the mid-October through mid-November. The consolidation gave way to a pullback, leaving sterling still about 2% higher.
Earlier this year, there were times when the market seemed more confident of a BOE rate hike than a Fed hike. Now it is quite a different story. By the time the BOE delivers its first hike, the Fed, even in a gradual mode, may already have lifted the interest rate target by 50-75 bp.
But is a December rate hike by the Fed a done deal? How can the December Fed funds futures (which Bloomberg and others calculate to imply only a 74% chance) be reconciled with market surveys that suggest 90% or more expect a hike? The key is the assumption of where Fed funds average after lift-off. Models assume that it will be in the middle of the Fed funds range. This need not be the case.
If the Fed wants to drive home the point of gradual tightening and maximize its control of excess reserves, it may choose to provide sufficient liquidity to keep the Fed funds rate below the middle of the target range. If one assumes that Fed funds will average 31.5 bp instead of 37.5 (the middle of the anticipated new range), a hike has been completely discounted. Because of the risk that Fed funds do not average the middle of the range, the December Fed funds may not completely discount a hike under the conventional approach.
We dispute claims that the dollar’s rally is over because the divergence of monetary policy has all been discounted. Consider that according to Bloomberg, the market has discounted a 40% chance of a second hike in March. Given that the Fed has signaled, through its dot-plots (which will be updated in a couple weeks), that a hike once a quarter or every other meeting is projected to be appropriate, the risk seems greater and not all priced into the futures strip.
At the same time, the high frequency economic data due out in the coming days, including import prices, wholesale and business inventory figures, producer prices, and even retail sales, is unlikely to impact either expectations for the Fed’s first or second rate hike. An irony not lost on many participants last week was as Yellen and other Fed officials talked about their confidence in the expansion, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNowcast for Q4 has been halved to 1.5% over the past month.
Policymakers put more emphasis on the signal generated from domestic final demand, accepting that the weak foreign growth and the drag from the dollar’s appreciation are temporary. The drivers of the inventory cycle, which still has a strong influence on short-run growth, extend beyond monetary policy. Household consumption drives 2/3 of the economy and continues to expand by 2.5%-3/0%. Moreover, the strength of consumption and services is helping the economy weather the headwinds hitting the industrial sector.
Great uncertainty remains over the outlook for China’s policy. Now that it is in the SDR, many expect Chinese officials to intervene less on the currency, with some thinking that devaluation in August was only the “first bite of the cherry, the second bite is coming.” Others argue that foreign central banks will begin boosting their yuan reserves soon, and this will provide the offset to the private capital outflows. There is also speculation that China will increase the band in which it allows the dollar-yuan exchange rate to move (2% from the central reference rate, or fix).
There is scope for the PBOC to ease monetary policy. There are numerous economic reports that will be released in the days ahead. Ironically, they are accepted with less cynicism than the GDP figures. Of the reports, investors tend to watch the CPI and trade figures the closest. China is expected to report a record trade surplus, which is one of the arguments against a significant depreciation of the yuan. Exports and imports are still contracting on a year-over-year basis.
China’s CPI has been stable this year. It has averaged 1.4% year-over-year through October, and it is expected to match it in November. This means policy rates remain too high. High reserve requirements may have been a macro-prudential tool during a period of strong capital inflow, but the 17.5% rate now seems ill-suited for a period of capital outflows. Even if the precise timing may be impossible forecast with any confidence, the bottom of China’s monetary cycle is not at hand.
What does this mean for the dollar? The divergence of monetary policy remains very much in place, and we think it is not fully priced in, and we wonder if it really can be discounted. We see the price action as an arguably long-overdue correction to a move that began in mid-October. The extent of market position had left it vulnerable to a buy (dollar) rumor, sell the fact even if the ECB had not disappointed.
Until we are closer to the peak in the monetary divergence, the main dollar driver, it is difficult to call an end to the third significant greenback rally since the end of Bretton Woods. For medium and long-term investors who broadly agree with this assessment, this pullback in the dollar is the kind of opportunity that has been awaited and anticipated. That said, a dollar decline is the pain trade. But given the sharp rally in US stocks ahead of the weekend, recouping everything it lost in the previous day’s debacle, and then some, it is the holiday season and investors prefer pleasure to pain.
This can make for choppy conditions and prevent a new trend from emerging immediately. The dollar bulls have been scared (emotional) and scarred (material losses), and will be reluctant to jump back in immediately. The bears may be more opportunistic than true-believers, and want to squeeze more bulls. However, they do not want to overstay their welcome, with a Fed hike looming, and the low-hanging fruit–the weak dollar longs–have already been picked.
The outlook for EM monetary policy is also diverging. Three major EM central banks meet this week, and are all expected to behave differently. Bank of Korea meets Thursday and is expected to keep rates steady at 1.5%. For now, it seems to be letting fiscal policy and a weak won do the heavy lifting. We cannot rule out further easing in 2016 if the economy remains sluggish. Peru’s central bank meets Thursday and is expected to hike rates 25 bp to 3.75%. The bank has signaled a cautious pace of tightening, but the 25 bp per quarter may have to be accelerated after CPI rose sharply to 4.2% y/y in November, furthest above the 1-3% target range for this cycle. Lastly, Russia’s central bank meets Friday and is expected to cut rates 50 bp to 10.5%. However, the market is split. Of the 25 analysts polled by Bloomberg, 12 see no change, 12 see a 50 bp cut to 10.5%, and 1 sees a 100 bp cut to 10%. For this meeting, we are in the steady policy camp, especially with the ruble weakening to levels not seen since September.